Preliminary Determination and Injunctions
Time is critical in intellectual property infringements: counterfeit goods can spread across the market quickly, an infringing website can disappear overnight, evidence can be destroyed. When infringement is suspected, we assess the urgency, obtain evidence preservation orders, preliminary injunctions and search and seizure orders from the courts, and personally carry out their enforcement.
What is evidence preservation?
Evidence preservation (delil tespiti) means securing, through the court and before an action is filed, evidence to be used in a future lawsuit against the risk of it being lost or altered. In intellectual property disputes, having the infringing product, website or sales records examined and recorded with an expert witness forms the core evidence of the case.
What is a preliminary injunction?
A preliminary injunction is an interim measure requested from the court to protect the right until the case is decided. The Industrial Property Law and the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works provide for measures stopping the production, sale and import of infringing products and seizing them. An injunction is usually granted against security and, if obtained before the action is filed, the main action must as a rule be filed within two weeks.
Because trade mark and copyright infringements can also be criminal offences, search and seizure orders can also be obtained through the public prosecutor in a criminal investigation. For counterfeit goods intercepted at customs, an application can be made to the customs authorities.
Scope
- Assessing the likelihood that your intellectual and industrial property rights are being infringed, and determining the urgency
- Conducting the evidence preservation procedures specific to intellectual property law before the courts
- Where immediate action is needed, applying for the interim protection and injunctive remedies provided by intellectual property law
- Personally enforcing preliminary injunctions and other interim protection measures
- Obtaining and enforcing search and seizure orders against counterfeit or smuggled goods
How We Work
- Assessing the alleged infringement, the documents proving ownership and the available evidence
- Choosing the fastest and most effective route: evidence preservation, preliminary injunction or criminal proceedings
- Preparing the application to the court or the prosecutor and planning the security
- Enforcing the order: recording and seizure accompanied by an expert, an enforcement officer or the police
- Tracking deadlines after the injunction and filing the main action
Team
Frequently Asked Questions
How quickly can a preliminary injunction be obtained?
In urgent cases, courts can decide on injunction requests quickly and without hearing the other side. How quickly depends on the request being backed by strong documents showing ownership and infringement.
Is it mandatory to provide security for an injunction?
As a rule, yes. The security covers the loss the other side may suffer if the injunction proves unjustified. The court sets the amount; the process should be planned from the start so that the security can be deposited quickly.
What can be done against marketplace sellers of counterfeit goods?
Removal of the products can be requested through marketplaces' intellectual property infringement notice mechanisms. If the seller commits repeated, large-scale infringements, evidence preservation, a preliminary injunction or a search and seizure order through criminal proceedings are also considered.
Can counterfeit goods be stopped at customs?
Yes. The right holder can apply to the customs authorities to suspend customs clearance of goods suspected of infringing its intellectual property rights. After the suspension, a preliminary injunction must be obtained from the court within the set period.
Would you like to discuss this service? Schedule a meeting with us — the first meeting is free of charge.
Schedule a meetingRelated Publications
- Distinctiveness Assessment in Trademark Examinations 06.12.2024
- Owner’s Right to Make Changes in Architectural Works 02.08.2022
- Rights Over a Person’s Image and Photograph 15.10.2024
- Deepfake Technology – Legal Challenges and Key Questions 17.11.2023
- Assessment of the ‘Quotation’ Method in Videos Published on Social Media in Terms of Turkish Intellectual Property Law 03.02.2023


