Acquired Distinctiveness
Also known as: Secondary Meaning, Distinctiveness Acquired Through Use, Kullanım Sonucu Ayırt Edicilik, IP Law Article 5(2)
Author Ali Gül
In short
The process by which a sign that is not inherently distinctive comes to identify a particular undertaking in the minds of consumers through long and intensive use, and thus becomes registrable as a trademark.
Some signs are not distinctive at the outset: they describe the product, are common in the trade or are simple expressions. But if an undertaking uses such a sign for a long time and intensively, consumers may start to see it as a name identifying that undertaking rather than the product itself. This is known as acquired distinctiveness.
Legal Basis
- At the registration stage: A sign that acquired distinctiveness through use before the filing date cannot be refused as descriptive or non-distinctive (IPL Article 5(2)).
- At the invalidity stage: A mark registered in breach of these grounds cannot be invalidated if it acquired distinctiveness through use before the invalidity claim (IPL Article 25(4)).
When Is It Accepted?
The decisive question is whether a significant proportion of the relevant consumers perceive the sign as indicating the origin of the goods or services. Relevant factors include:
- Duration, intensity and geographical extent of use
- Market share and sales volume
- Advertising and promotional spend
- Documents showing press, trade and consumer perception
Use should be close to the form applied for. It is difficult to prove that a word used together with a distinctive logo has acquired distinctiveness on its own.
In Practice
This argument is frequently raised in appeals against TÜRKPATENT refusals and in trademark litigation. The burden of proof lies on the applicant, and well-organised, dated and sourced evidence is often decisive. For the general principle see Distinctiveness.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is acquired distinctiveness proven?
Through evidence such as sales figures and market share, advertising spend, duration and geographical extent of use, press coverage, statements from trade bodies and consumer surveys. A single piece of evidence is rarely enough.
Must distinctiveness be acquired throughout Turkey?
The assessment is based on the relevant consumers in Turkey. Use confined to a narrow region makes acceptance harder.
Related Services
Publications in this area
- Distinctiveness Assessment in Trademark Examinations 06.12.2024
- Rights Over a Person’s Image and Photograph 15.10.2024
- Deepfake Technology – Legal Challenges and Key Questions 17.11.2023
- Assessment of the ‘Quotation’ Method in Videos Published on Social Media in Terms of Turkish Intellectual Property Law 03.02.2023
Schedule a meeting with us — the first meeting is free of charge.
Schedule a meeting